The audit committee considered the requirements of both the Code and
the Act in line with its responsibilities. It has amended its board charter
and work plan to address these requirements.
Outside of these developments, during the year the audit committee
worked closely with the board and risk committee on the key financial
aspects of a number of pertinent matters within our business. Although
some of these matters are discussed in other reviews in this integrated
report, my review aims to address these from a financial and internal
control perspective.
Impairment of Construction Materials asset base
The construction industry suffered a substantial slowdown, resulting
in excess available capacity, including in the aggregates, sand
and readymix concrete markets. This placed extreme downward
pressure on volumes and prices within the group’s Construction
Materials cluster.
Practice requires that the carrying value of non-current assets,
including property, plant and equipment and the undeveloped mining resources related to the ore body in the group’s fixed quarries are
reviewed on an annual basis or when there is an indication of
impairment. Estimating the recoverability of undeveloped mining
resources in a market which presents little visibility and for an ore
body which holds a life in excess of 40 years is therefore very complex.
During the year, the audit committee worked closely with the group’s
executive management during their process of determining the carrying
value of the quarry-related assets and the subsequent verification of
the impairment of this carrying value. The audit committee and board
are satisfied that due caution was applied to the assessment of this
impairment balance.

Middle East – resolution of legacy items and approval
of future strategy
The group has an established presence in the Middle East with a
track record of profitability and the establishment of an order book
in the region of R4 billion as at June 2008. However, in late 2008 the
Dubai market practically collapsed due to global market pressure, resulting in the cancellation of two of the group’s major contracts in
January 2009.
The impact was not only the loss of future work to be executed, but also
the required commercial process to ensure an effective and timeous
resolution of amounts due to the group on these contracts. Over the
last two financial years, the group has spent a considerable amount of
time negotiating with its two main clients on these contracts to ensure
that the group is presented with a resolution which is acceptable to the
board of directors in the preservation of shareholder value.
Ensuring resolution of the debt payment terms, as well as evaluating
the most responsible strategy for the group in the United Arab Emirates
(UAE) required a substantial amount of time and resources from both
the group’s executive and the Middle East business. To effectively
understand the numerous challenges in the region and its potential
financial impact, the board decided that certain audit and risk
committee members should travel to the region to obtain first-hand
understanding of the issues.
I therefore travelled with members of the executive team and my fellow
board member, John Job, to Dubai, Jordan and Qatar in June to
address the following:
 |
The recoverability of the debts due on the cancelled and legacy
contracts in Dubai |
 |
A review of the Jordanian pipeline contract which incurred
additional costs to implement corrective action |
 |
The evaluation of business development opportunities in line with
the group’s strategy to retain a presence in the Middle East |
Based on this visit and following continued interaction with the
group’s executives during the year, the audit committee was
comfortable to report back to the board that management’s actions
to resolve these issues have been sound. It is also supportive of
the group’s expansion into certain Middle East markets targeted
by the group.
Unwinding of a portion of the group’s broad-based
black economic empowerment (BBBEE) transaction
A key focus area for the group remained the effective management of
the legal process relating to the unwind of a portion of its BBBEE
ownership transaction held by the iLima Consortium. The challenge
during the year was to ensure the group would maintain its BBBEE
rating in terms of the Construction Sector scorecard post the unwind.
The board allocated the overview of this process to the audit committee which established a sub-committee to consider, advise on and, where
necessary, approve:
 |
The legal actions to be undertaken around the unwind process
in the best interest of the group and its stakeholders while
remaining sensitive to the imperative to have strong black
shareholding |
 |
The investigation into the options for a revised ownership BBBEE
structure which will in time be presented to shareholders for final
approval |
The audit committee considers this responsibility to be one of its key
priorities. It is pleased with the progress made so far.
Risk-bearing capacity model
As is mentioned on page 101, during the year the group focused
extensively on enhancing its risk management procedures by
formalising the application of its risk-bearing capacity model. One of
the four pillars of the model relates to the group’s financial strength to
withstand changes in risk profiles in the group.
The group’s finance function has an entrenched forecasting system
which caters for the effects of the current order book as well as for
opportunities available to the group on cash flow and liquidity. All these
are evaluated along with their investment and financing requirements
to present a consolidated group financial position.
During the year, under the guidance of both the risk and audit
committees, this financial forecasting model was strengthened and
closely linked to the group’s risk-bearing capacity. This provides a
powerful barometer to monitor the group’s financial strength and
capacity to assume risk.
The audit committee believes this rigorous interrogation of financial
robustness and capacity is imperative to cater for the tough trading
conditions which will continue to exist in our markets.
Compliance
The group currently operates in 22 countries and is required to
adhere to a wide range of laws and regulations. A key focus area
of the audit committee is the assessment of compliance with regard
to finance and taxation disciplines. Compliance adherence continues
to become more onerous on the group as both local and international
authorities introduce additional requirements. To adhere to these
in the context of a reducing headcount in line with the focus on cost
control in difficult trading conditions, placed considerable pressure on the group. During the year, the audit committee monitored
and was comfortable with the group’s progress in this regard.
